Tuesday, May 31, 2011

blue eyes black

blue eyes black. lue eyes black. girl w/ lue
  • lue eyes black. girl w/ lue



  • esaleris
    Nov 16, 01:06 PM
    There is absolutely no, no, no way that Intel did not enter a contractual agreement with Apple that explicitly prohibits or deters Apple from using AMD's competitive products. Intel and Apple's partnership - not the traditional buyer-seller - extends into R&D and other considerable investments. Additionally, Apple is too small of a company to be able to leverage their volume in a way that would free them from such an agreement. Bottom line? We won't see an AMD in Apple for another 2-3 years, if it were to happen at all.





    blue eyes black. lue grey eyes and lack
  • lue grey eyes and lack



  • caliguy
    Nov 23, 08:08 PM
    I hear Apple retail stores open as early as 7am!!

    As early as 6am, actually.





    blue eyes black. Blue Eyed Black Hair Girls
  • Blue Eyed Black Hair Girls



  • aliensporebomb
    Apr 25, 11:50 AM
    Curiouser and curiouser.

    If it's a fake, whoever did it did a pretty interesting job on it.

    It looks plausible.

    I mean we had:

    iphone 3g
    iphone 3gs

    why not
    iphone 4
    iphone 4gs

    Which would give incentive for people to go for the white one I guess.

    then the 5 comes out later?





    blue eyes black. lue eyes
  • lue eyes



  • Popeye206
    May 3, 11:16 PM
    When I hear �It�s just getting started,� that signals to me there is more to come. Which implies that patience will be rewarded. Which further implies to wait for future models. That's obviously not how Apple intended it, but that�s the way I interpret it as a viewer. Could just be me though. I am a very happy owner of many Apple products by the way�including an iPad 1st gen�so I�m not being biased against Apple by any means. JMO

    I don't think they're trying to hint towards anything hardware... I think they're setting up for the changes coming with iOS 5, Lion and the new iCloud stuff.

    Can't wait until June... I think we have some very nice surprises coming for all Apple devices.





    blue eyes black. Black haired Blue eyed Girl
  • Black haired Blue eyed Girl



  • leekohler
    Jan 15, 02:08 PM
    Who is Apple kidding, the ultra-portable market is for *cheap* ultra-portables or for Tablets. If I didn't buy a 7" touch-screen UMPC for $1000, why on earth would I buy a non-touchscreen, ethernetless, 13" envelope-sized "sub-notebook". The price is Pro-line, the lack of screen options, lack of graphics, lack of FW800, lack of ethernet, speaks otherwise. Even a touchscreen would have saved this thing, right now its just an incredibly expensive, thinner, backlit Macbook. I mean, I get it is thin, but are they serious? My MBP is thin enough....

    Agreed- this was a real bummer.





    blue eyes black. Blue Eyed Black Boy?
  • Blue Eyed Black Boy?



  • pudrums
    Apr 8, 06:09 PM
    16 Blocks

    http://pic.leech.it/i/7d0f6/a6317ca0125698104.jpg





    blue eyes black. says that Black Americans
  • says that Black Americans



  • blahblah100
    Mar 28, 02:40 PM
    Of course, all the HATERS will cry foul.

    Kanye? I didn't know Kanye West posted on this forum.

    P.S. Your music sucks. Also, what you did to Taylor Swift was out of line.





    blue eyes black. lue eye makeup tutorial.
  • lue eye makeup tutorial.



  • chrisgeleven
    Jan 5, 03:23 PM
    Why did Apple do away with live feeds of the event? That seems like a good idea. What are they trying to avoid?

    That little thing called bandwidth. You know how many people will be hitting that streaming video stream if it were live? With it being tape delayed, Apple can somewhat spread out the number of people who will be watching it.

    Heck I have a hard enough time viewing the keynote hours after it was released, never mind trying to do it live.





    blue eyes black. we also have BLUE eyes on
  • we also have BLUE eyes on



  • Eduardo1971
    Nov 24, 01:30 PM
    Oddly enough, from the education store, you can't get the extra discounts. Well at least not on the ipod...but on the government store ... YOU CAN!
    I would have save an extra $30 if I went through the gvt store. OOOPS! Hopefully someone else benefits from this post and doesnt make the same mistake! I will probably call apple in the morning and see if I can get the extra savings ... but just a heads up if you are a gvt employee!
    :D

    Yeah, I tried to see any discounts one their education portal. No discounts.

    May you provide the link to Apple's Federal employee portal?





    blue eyes black. Blue eye black baby - story
  • Blue eye black baby - story



  • MagnusVonMagnum
    May 1, 07:46 PM
    Wow, at no time in this rant did you come close to a point. You actually argued both for and against my point at various times in your incoherent ramble.

    Sure, right...and you managed to say exactly NOTHING in ANY of your posts other than flames and insults, always with some lame excuse why you cannot be bothered to give any kind of lucid or even logical reply. I've concluded you're nothing but a TROLL and therefore belong on the ignore list. Goodbye troll. :p





    blue eyes black. lue eyes black.
  • lue eyes black.



  • gnasher729
    Oct 4, 04:30 PM
    Indeed, there would need to be a "helper" that checks to see where the track came from, and redirects it to DoubleTwist if necessary.

    I'm interested in seeing where this all goes, it'll hopefully silence the complaints of the lack of an NZ iTMS.

    Not necessarily. We don't know exactly how FairPlay works. Lets say I download my favorite song from iTMS. iTMS encrypts the song and adds my AppleID to it. When iTunes wants to play the song, it calls iTMS, gives it my AppleID, the iTMS returns a key to decrypt the song, iTunes decrypts it and plays it. Most likely iTunes will actually send both my AppleID + some ID for the song, so that if I crack the key for one song I cannot copy _all_ my songs.

    Now the question is: Does iTMS keep track of all the songs that I bought or not? If it doesn't keep track of all the songs then the following would be possible: DoubleTwist adds a a random song id to the song. Then it adds _my_ AppleID and encrypts the file. When iTunes wants to play the song, it notices that it is encrypted, and takes my AppleID plus the song ID and sends it to iTMS. If iTMS doesn't keep track of songs then it will calculate which key would decrypt the file (if Apple had sold me a song with that song ID). And that key could be used to decrypt the song.

    Another possibility: DoubleTwist could take the song ID and my AppleID from _any_ one song ABC that I bought from iTMS. It could be possible to find which key was used to encrypt that song from that information; nobody would have tried to make it difficult to find out. The decryption key is top secret, not the encryption key. So with this information, DoubleTwist could encrypt any song XYZ with exactly the same key as the one song ABC that I bought from iTMS. When I try to play any of those songs, iTunes will find the my Apple ID and the song ID of ABC attached to the song, sends it to iTMS, which returns the key to decrypt ABC, and uses it to decrypt XYZ. And since XYZ was encrypted with the same key as ABC, it will decrypt and play.





    blue eyes black. Black Lemur has Blue Eyes
  • Black Lemur has Blue Eyes



  • Rodimus Prime
    May 4, 11:54 AM
    And why is this on mac rumors.

    Does it really matter what the competition does.


    Well seeing how in 6 pages I have yet to see the logical answer to this I will give it.

    It is because it shows the US carries are cracking down on tethering and going after them.
    Now there is still an easy way to get said apps threw market with out sideload.
    Put your phone in airplane mode. Then turn on wifi and boom full market access while in airplane mode.





    blue eyes black. Boy have lue eyes,
  • Boy have lue eyes,



  • Creibold
    Nov 23, 05:24 PM
    Wow for the 80gb iPod that like what? 3%?? What a sale.





    blue eyes black. lue eyes black.
  • lue eyes black.



  • SactoGuy18
    Aug 6, 11:21 PM
    I think the Volt is a technological dead-end given the steep US$41,000 price and the fact your car is lugging around a big bank of batteries as deadweight.

    As an aside, expect a lot more turbodiesel cars in the US market over the next few years. Reason: the new Euro 6 emissions standard coming into force starting in 2014. Since Euro 6 is very similar to the EPA Tier 2 Bin 5 emissions standard and many automotive manufacturers want to get their turbodiesel engines Euro 6-compliant as soon as possible, that means it will be soon very easy for European cars with turbodiesel engines to be 50-state certified for US sale. There are rumors that a new generation of Euro 6-compliant turbodiesels being developed at Volkswagen, Mercedes-Benz and BMW will likely be offered in the USA as early as the 2012 calendar year.





    blue eyes black. Black Haired Blue Eyed Girl
  • Black Haired Blue Eyed Girl



  • Multimedia
    Oct 4, 12:21 PM
    I'm afraid the new Intel Apple is going to be the same as the old PPC Apple.

    Apple, (in the past), always blamed slow implementation of new processors and long shipping wait times on low Motorola or IBM processor yields.

    Now Apple doesn't have the same excuse with Intel but I bet we don't see a Merom MBP or an Octo-MacPro until MacWorld SF or later.

    Anyone taking bets!I'm not betting. But I think the C2D MB & MBPs will come out before Thanksgiving November 23. I can see them holding out on the Dual Clovertown Mac Pro for dramatic purposes in the January 9 SteveNote. But they will be a full two months behind the shipping date if they do, which would confirm your fear which I can fully understand.

    Seems like they have not figured out how to turn on a dime or have make a conscious decision to not try and keep up with the latest ASAP and just poke along to the beat of their own weird drum. I feel a little bit hostage to their slow release pace. But perhaps we can't really understand what goes on behind the curtain and should cut them more slack. :)

    After all, they were spot on with the rapid release of the C2D iMacs a month ago. Maybe we're all being irrationally and prematurely impatient.





    blue eyes black. Hair Blue Eyes, Black Hair
  • Hair Blue Eyes, Black Hair



  • someguy
    Jul 24, 09:39 AM
    <--micropod image-->
    Absolutely hilarious! Thanks for the laugh!





    blue eyes black. lue eyes black girl Crave by
  • lue eyes black girl Crave by



  • spicyapple
    Sep 12, 07:22 AM
    What y'all doing up so early? :)

    Can't wait, can't wait!!





    blue eyes black. face with lue eyes, lack
  • face with lue eyes, lack



  • spillproof
    Sep 28, 04:25 PM
    I do love the pocket door idea.

    I wonder if he will have a glass spiral staircase?





    blue eyes black. Blue Eyed Black Hair Girls
  • Blue Eyed Black Hair Girls



  • chrisdazzo
    Apr 7, 11:20 PM
    Just purchased a date on April 19th at my Mac with these 2 goofballs. :D

    http://kttns.org/iyjbj

    Also, $30 worth of 87 gasoline. I'm dying here; this crap costs so damn much now.





    MonkeyET
    Dec 18, 04:08 PM
    My question is if AT&T's exclusivity indeed DOESN'T expire until 2012, then what's the deal with the lack of AT&T iPhone commercials on TV these days? There was a time, not so long ago, when it seemd like every other TV commercial was AT&T whoring the iPhone. Now, it seems like I never see iPhone ads on TV and AT&T is touting every other phone EXCEPT the iPhone.

    Didn't Apple just release a new commercial in the last few weeks about the longer life of the iPhone 4 battery compared to other smartphones? If not for this commercial, I would have gone alone with your argument.





    leekohler
    Apr 25, 04:00 PM
    I think the OP's point- and I agree- is that they went a lot further then just NOT doing something right. They did something wrong. Its past the point of should have had an armed guard....its now into looking at what they did and maybe holding them accountable for their actions, too.

    Yes, they did. They encouraged it and called no one. This went on for a very long time too. Some of you need to go watch the video before you comment. I fixed the link. You will not believe what you see.





    NebulaClash
    Apr 29, 01:37 PM
    These naysayers have been moaning and groaning about iOS forever. They will continue to do so forever. In the meantime the rest of the world will get on with using some great software (many of it free) and getting a lot of things done.

    I'm glad Apple is pushing things forward. The last thing I want to see is OS X stagnate. Since we are now in the post-PC era, ideas from iOS are precisely what need to be explored. It won't be too many more years from now when the majority of consumer-level computing devices will be tablets running iOS-type gestures. It will be the expected thing to be able to support finger gestures to do common tasks. Any OS that cannot handle this will be considered old-fashioned.

    Apple is doing the right thing by getting the future into OS X. They don't want to be left behind.





    kdarling
    Dec 13, 08:49 PM
    Also, I don't imagine that AT&T & Apple signed a contract that had exclusivity expiring on December 26, 2010. It would make far more sense for a contract to be written that extends through the end of though some have even speculated it extends through 2012 (heaven help us and Apple if that's the case).

    Summertime seems more likely.

    We know that the original contract was signed in the Summer of 2006. (Five years from then would be Summer 2011.)

    We know that an amended contract came almost exactly one year later (ATT said so), which dropped royalty payments and allowed subsidies.

    Rumors say that a two year extension came in 2008.

    Patent dispute documents brought up that there had been a five year contract at one time, but didn't mention whether it was still in force.





    jephrey
    Oct 11, 10:34 AM
    Even though Apple has a good foothold, and the current iPod can probably hold off the Zune for a while, I don't think Apple will even let the Zune get any kind of momentum. If Apple wants the iPod to continue to be THE music/movie player for everyone, they at least should be able to match the wifi and larger screen. This really isn't a rumor, more of just logical speculation. The 5.5G really isn't major enough. I believe that the only major improvement was the firmware aside a bigger drive and brighter screen. Basically, I don't think that will have any bearing on a G6. It would be nice if there was more difinitive evidence of this, but I don't mind the speculation. It just shows that others are thinking like me, and that hopefully Apple is too.

    J



    No comments:

    Post a Comment