skellener
Apr 4, 11:23 AM
And so how is merging with T-Mobile going to open up choice, provide more competition and benefit customers? Sounds like they are just getting an early start on price gouging here.
Not only should the merger be rejected but AT&T should be broken into about 5 separate companies.
Not only should the merger be rejected but AT&T should be broken into about 5 separate companies.
Prom1
Sep 5, 11:20 AM
No problem :) Not sure if the Michael Jackson one will look the greatest considering that the music video that the shot was taken from was filmed in the late 80s but it should still look fine.
http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/4044/00038m2tssnapshot010125.png
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/2940/tt04685697.jpg
Enjoy :)
Thank you VERY much.
http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/4044/00038m2tssnapshot010125.png
http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/2940/tt04685697.jpg
Enjoy :)
Thank you VERY much.
labman
May 3, 10:00 PM
youtube just search best, top themes! there are a ton! there are also several threads showing themes apps etc.. if you want to convince them let them play with yours. I love mine but I also feel it's not for everybody. Also if you take jailbreaking away I'm out!
andrewsd
Mar 2, 02:44 PM
I am excited.. ....... :(
more...
frunkis54
Oct 29, 01:01 PM
http://guides.macrumors.com/Help:MacRumors_FAQ#How_do_user_titles_work.3F
thank you :)
thank you :)
irmongoose
Nov 29, 12:19 PM
Practically speaking...
If they limit the number of iPods you can transfer the movies onto, how are they going to differentiate between an additional iPod and one you replaced for a newer one? What I mean is, if they would only allow for a transfer to 5 iPods, and let's say you have 5 and one breaks, or eventually you replace them all for newly released ones, how will they be able to differentiate that from an "additional 6th iPod"?
The entire scheme is flawed. Practically speaking.
irmongoose
If they limit the number of iPods you can transfer the movies onto, how are they going to differentiate between an additional iPod and one you replaced for a newer one? What I mean is, if they would only allow for a transfer to 5 iPods, and let's say you have 5 and one breaks, or eventually you replace them all for newly released ones, how will they be able to differentiate that from an "additional 6th iPod"?
The entire scheme is flawed. Practically speaking.
irmongoose
more...
untypoed
Apr 11, 04:36 AM
[Not going to quote the entire 3 pictures]
Who's ass is that?
Who's ass is that?
Swissfondue
Oct 2, 02:20 PM
I sincerely hope so. I can't even login to my company's iNotes site from my Mac because Macs are not supported (only runs with IE 6.00+).
more...
allisonnn
Oct 24, 02:53 PM
anyone?
woohoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :apple:
woohoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :apple:
gcoghill
Apr 28, 09:22 PM
Why? The law requires an rights owner to defend its IP or risk losing it. These suits are just business, no hard feelings, as seen by Apple's monster-sized component contract w/ Samsung. Any yes, business is about making money.
Every time there's a patent or copyright article and people go off the deep end calling these companies crazy/evil, etc, I wish the article would indicate the fact that they are actually required to do so or risk losing their patent/trademarks. Doesn't even matter if they want to or not.
Every time there's a patent or copyright article and people go off the deep end calling these companies crazy/evil, etc, I wish the article would indicate the fact that they are actually required to do so or risk losing their patent/trademarks. Doesn't even matter if they want to or not.
more...
rikers_mailbox
Oct 5, 08:50 PM
Those Safari updates? I would expect no less!!
If Safari didn't at least keep up with FireFox, then shame Apple. At best Safari should innovate just as much as Apple claims. How about CoverFlow for cached pages?
If Safari didn't at least keep up with FireFox, then shame Apple. At best Safari should innovate just as much as Apple claims. How about CoverFlow for cached pages?
rainman::|:|
Apr 30, 08:42 PM
a very good idea indeed.
pnw
pnw
more...
lgutie20
Apr 6, 12:13 PM
This is torture... I just wish Apple would send out invitations for another event and tell us themselves what it is that we will be seeing. Please, Apple?
scotty96LSC
Oct 1, 07:09 AM
Link (http://browse.deviantart.com/?q=1440x900&order=5&offset=96#/d2zn6hz)
http://idisk.mac.com/txwhitehouse//Public/Oct10.png
•Dock icons from Deviant Art
•Geektool Scripts for Computer, Weather and Music Info
http://idisk.mac.com/txwhitehouse//Public/Oct10.png
•Dock icons from Deviant Art
•Geektool Scripts for Computer, Weather and Music Info
more...
AP_piano295
May 5, 10:08 AM
I did said that I wouldn't support torturing innocent people.
How do we know if they're innocent best torture them to be sure.
How do we know if they're innocent best torture them to be sure.
purduepick
Apr 6, 12:09 PM
Lets hope they fix the OSX Server SMTP issue as well. We had to move everyone off of outlook for Mac because it would no longer connect for the SMTP side of our OSX server. Could receive email no problem but would not send. Move to OSX Mail and no issue. Outlook on PC no issue. Very odd problem and could not solve it.
more...
iNewbie
Sep 30, 11:40 AM
Lotus Notes is a great program when it's implemented correctly. We've been using it over 10 years now and there's still nothing out there that can touch it.
Improved support on the Apple is a good thing. They are even improving the client on Linux as well. That will really give people the potential to move away from windows.
Improved support on the Apple is a good thing. They are even improving the client on Linux as well. That will really give people the potential to move away from windows.
newtoiphonesdk
Apr 19, 10:19 PM
I am looking for a tutorial to help guide me in being able to save a pdf or doc from the NSURL loaded in webview, to a tableview that can be accessed offline at any time.
jeffs177
Nov 19, 12:00 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7)
It goes to show you that they can still make a profit with $100 off. I guess the price gouging by Apple continues.
It goes to show you that they can still make a profit with $100 off. I guess the price gouging by Apple continues.
theGAPkid
Oct 12, 06:27 AM
http://i289.photobucket.com/albums/ll226/dtmiddleton/Screenshot2010-10-12at122311.png
I love the photos featured on fiftyfootshadows.net (http://fiftyfootshadows.net). His photos are stunning, and they are all perfect desktop pictures! :cool:
I love the photos featured on fiftyfootshadows.net (http://fiftyfootshadows.net). His photos are stunning, and they are all perfect desktop pictures! :cool:
bigrobb
Dec 6, 04:31 PM
Here is my imac and ipad wallpapers
Porchland
Apr 4, 11:00 AM
Simple solution: Financial Times should put out a browser version of the publication that is optimized for viewing on an iPad and simply require the same login that is does now for its web version.
I don't pay extra for the iPad version of nytimes.com on my iPad, so I use the web version instead (and it's not even optimized for iPad the way the mobile version is optimized for iPhone). I don't get the benefit of the snazzier iPad app, but I'm also not paying for it.
Apple created the iOS platform and allows third parties to develop apps for it as long as you play by Apple's rules. If you don't like Apple's rules, optimize your product to run as a web page for iPhone/iPad or just rely on the web version you have now.
Frankly, I wish more publications would do that: I would be fine to read web-based, iPad-optized versions of the New Yorker, New York Times, Newsweek, etc., if the subscription prices are cheaper than an iPad version and it means the publisher actually makes a web-based subscription available, even if it means I'm giving up some UI coolness, better graphics, etc., but not getting the iPad version.
The market works just fine.
I don't pay extra for the iPad version of nytimes.com on my iPad, so I use the web version instead (and it's not even optimized for iPad the way the mobile version is optimized for iPhone). I don't get the benefit of the snazzier iPad app, but I'm also not paying for it.
Apple created the iOS platform and allows third parties to develop apps for it as long as you play by Apple's rules. If you don't like Apple's rules, optimize your product to run as a web page for iPhone/iPad or just rely on the web version you have now.
Frankly, I wish more publications would do that: I would be fine to read web-based, iPad-optized versions of the New Yorker, New York Times, Newsweek, etc., if the subscription prices are cheaper than an iPad version and it means the publisher actually makes a web-based subscription available, even if it means I'm giving up some UI coolness, better graphics, etc., but not getting the iPad version.
The market works just fine.
G5Unit
Mar 30, 07:00 PM
buy a memory card
That's not really in the budget right now:(
Anyway I can back it up to my Mac?
That's not really in the budget right now:(
Anyway I can back it up to my Mac?
nipo
Apr 4, 10:12 AM
Does ATT offer lower off contract prices like T-mobile? You're only saving $150 off the no contract price with the change.
No comments:
Post a Comment